[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH security-next v4 10/32] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:20 PM, James Morris <> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>> LSM initialization failures have traditionally been ignored. We should
>> at least WARN when something goes wrong.
> I guess we could have a boot param which specifies what to do if any LSM
> fails to init, as I think some folks will want to stop execution at that
> point.
> Thoughts?

I'm not opposed, but I won't author it because Linus will yell at me
about introducing a "machine killing" option.


Kees Cook
Pixel Security

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-02 23:38    [W:0.061 / U:3.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site