lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: ethernet: fec: Add missing SPEED_
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:38:32PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/18/2018 12:16 PM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2018 11:47 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:39:24AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>> On 10/18/2018 08:05 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> >>>>> Since commit 58056c1e1b0e ("net: ethernet: Use phy_set_max_speed() to limit advertised speed"), the fec driver is unable to get any link.
> >>>>> This is due to missing SPEED_.
> >>>>
> >>>> But SPEED_1000 is defined in include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h as 1000, so
> >>>> surely this would amount to the same code paths being taken or am I
> >>>> missing something here?
> >>>
> >>> The bisect session pointed your patch, reverting it fix the issue.
> >>> BUT since the fix seemed trivial I sent the patch without more test then compile it.
> >>> Sorry, I have just found some minutes ago that it didnt fix the issue.
> >>>
> >>> But your patch is still the cause for sure.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What you are writing is really lowering the confidence level, first
> >> Andrew is the author of that patch, and second "just compiling" and
> >> pretending this fixes a problem when it does not is not quite what I
> >> would expect.
> >>
> >> I don't have a problem helping you find the solution or the right fix
> >> though, even if it is not my patch, but please get the author and actual
> >> problem right so we can move forward in confidence, thanks!
> >
> > Sorry again, I wanted to acknoledge my error but I did it too fast and late.
> > And sorry to have confound you with Andrew.
>
> No worries, here to help, let us know what your bisection points to. THanks

I have added printing of phydev->supported
My working kernel (on top of 58056c1e1b0e + revert patch) got:
[ 5.550838] fec_enet_mii_probe 2ff (gbit features)
[ 5.555848] fec_enet_mii_probe 2ef (without 1000baseT_Half)
[ 5.561620] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef final (after pause)
[ 5.566914] Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY 2188000.ethernet-1:06: attached PHY driver [Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet-1:06, irq=POLL)
[ 8.730751] fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
[ 8.788311] Sending DHCP requests ., OK
[ 8.832357] IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.66.1, my address is 192.168.66.58

the non-working kernel (next-20181015)
[ 7.308917] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ff after phy_set_max_speed
[ 7.314545] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ef after phy_remove_link_mode
[ 7.320418] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ef after pause
and then no link

So it seems that phy_set_max_speed adds bit 14 (ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT)

I have patched by adding:
phy_remove_link_mode(phy_dev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT);
and got:
[ 7.310559] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ff after phy_set_max_speed
[ 7.316221] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef after phy_remove_link_mode
[ 7.322128] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef after pause
[ 7.326681] Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY 2188000.ethernet-1:06: attached PHY driver [Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet-1:06, irq=POLL)
[ 7.611276] Waiting up to 3 more seconds for network.
[ 7.881278] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
[ 8.131277] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
[ 8.401169] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
[ 8.671269] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
[ 8.941274] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
[ 9.211181] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
[ 9.481274] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
[ 9.751275] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
[ 10.021281] Waiting up to 0 more seconds for network.
[ 10.291274] Waiting up to 0 more seconds for network.
[ 10.381282] Sending DHCP requests .
[ 10.473000] fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
[ 12.861267] ., OK
[ 12.903405] IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.66.1, my address is 192.168.66.58

So at least I got a link, but the link is still late to got

Regards

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-18 22:00    [W:0.107 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site