lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memblock: remove stale #else and the code it protects
Which tree it applies?

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:03:45PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>During removal of HAVE_MEMBLOCK definition, the #else clause of the
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> ...
> #else
> ...
> #endif
>
>conditional was not removed.
>
>Remove it now.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Reported-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
>Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>index d3bc270..d4d0e01 100644
>--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>@@ -597,11 +597,6 @@ static inline void early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> {
> }
> #endif
>-#else
>-static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
>-{
>- return 0;
>-}
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
>--
>2.7.4

--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-19 10:18    [W:0.055 / U:3.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site