lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller
From
Date


On 2018/10/19 4:39, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:09:05 +0800
> Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com> wrote:
>
>> +static int meson_nfc_calc_set_timing(struct meson_nfc *nfc,
>> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings)
>> +{
>> + struct nand_timing *timing = &nfc->timing;
>> + int div, bt_min, bt_max, bus_timing;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP((timings->tRC_min / 1000), NFC_CLK_CYCLE);
>> + ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 1000000000 / div);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set nand clock rate\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + timing->twb = DIV_ROUND_UP(PSEC_TO_NSEC(timings->tWB_max),
>> + div * NFC_CLK_CYCLE);
>> + timing->tadl = DIV_ROUND_UP(PSEC_TO_NSEC(timings->tADL_min),
>> + div * NFC_CLK_CYCLE);
>> + timing->twhr = DIV_ROUND_UP(PSEC_TO_NSEC(timings->tWHR_min),
>> + div * NFC_CLK_CYCLE);
>> +
>> + bt_min = (timings->tREA_max + NFC_DEFAULT_DELAY) / div;
>> + bt_max = (NFC_DEFAULT_DELAY + timings->tRHOH_min
>> + + timings->tRC_min / 2) / div;
>> +
>> + bt_min = DIV_ROUND_UP(bt_min, 1000);
>> + bt_max = DIV_ROUND_UP(bt_max, 1000);
>> +
>> + if (bt_max < bt_min)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + bus_timing = (bt_min + bt_max) / 2 + 1;
>> +
>> + writel((1 << 21), nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CFG);
>> + writel((NFC_CLK_CYCLE - 1) | (bus_timing << 5),
>> + nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CFG);
>> +
>> + writel((1 << 31), nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +meson_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
>> + const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
>> +{
>> + struct meson_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(nand);
>> + const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
>> +
>> + timings = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
>> + if (IS_ERR(timings))
>> + return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + if (csline == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY)
>> + return 0;
>
> Hm, before saying you supporting the requested timing, you should make
> sure they are actually supported. I'd recommend splitting this in 2
> steps:
>
> 1/ calc timings
> 2/ store the timings in the chip priv struct so that they can be
> applied next time ->select_chip() is called.
>
ok, i will try to split.

>> +
>> + meson_nfc_calc_set_timing(nfc, timings);
> > You should not set the timing from ->setup_data_interface(), just
> calculate them, make sure they are supported and store the state in the
> private chip struct. Applying those timings should be done in
> ->select_chip(), so that you can support 2 chips with different timings.
>
em, i will fix it.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-19 10:04    [W:0.135 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site