lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: ethernet: fec: Add missing SPEED_
From
Date
On 10/18/2018 12:59 PM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:38:32PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 10/18/2018 12:16 PM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 10/18/2018 11:47 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:39:24AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/18/2018 08:05 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>>>>>> Since commit 58056c1e1b0e ("net: ethernet: Use phy_set_max_speed() to limit advertised speed"), the fec driver is unable to get any link.
>>>>>>> This is due to missing SPEED_.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But SPEED_1000 is defined in include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h as 1000, so
>>>>>> surely this would amount to the same code paths being taken or am I
>>>>>> missing something here?
>>>>>
>>>>> The bisect session pointed your patch, reverting it fix the issue.
>>>>> BUT since the fix seemed trivial I sent the patch without more test then compile it.
>>>>> Sorry, I have just found some minutes ago that it didnt fix the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> But your patch is still the cause for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What you are writing is really lowering the confidence level, first
>>>> Andrew is the author of that patch, and second "just compiling" and
>>>> pretending this fixes a problem when it does not is not quite what I
>>>> would expect.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a problem helping you find the solution or the right fix
>>>> though, even if it is not my patch, but please get the author and actual
>>>> problem right so we can move forward in confidence, thanks!
>>>
>>> Sorry again, I wanted to acknoledge my error but I did it too fast and late.
>>> And sorry to have confound you with Andrew.
>>
>> No worries, here to help, let us know what your bisection points to. THanks
>
> I have added printing of phydev->supported
> My working kernel (on top of 58056c1e1b0e + revert patch) got:
> [ 5.550838] fec_enet_mii_probe 2ff (gbit features)
> [ 5.555848] fec_enet_mii_probe 2ef (without 1000baseT_Half)
> [ 5.561620] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef final (after pause)
> [ 5.566914] Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY 2188000.ethernet-1:06: attached PHY driver [Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet-1:06, irq=POLL)
> [ 8.730751] fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
> [ 8.788311] Sending DHCP requests ., OK
> [ 8.832357] IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.66.1, my address is 192.168.66.58
>
> the non-working kernel (next-20181015)
> [ 7.308917] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ff after phy_set_max_speed
> [ 7.314545] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ef after phy_remove_link_mode
> [ 7.320418] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ef after pause
> and then no link
>
> So it seems that phy_set_max_speed adds bit 14 (ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT)

It's not masking it so it must be coming from phy_probe().

>
> I have patched by adding:
> phy_remove_link_mode(phy_dev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT);
> and got:
> [ 7.310559] fec_enet_mii_probe 62ff after phy_set_max_speed
> [ 7.316221] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef after phy_remove_link_mode
> [ 7.322128] fec_enet_mii_probe 22ef after pause
> [ 7.326681] Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY 2188000.ethernet-1:06: attached PHY driver [Micrel KSZ9021 Gigabit PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=2188000.ethernet-1:06, irq=POLL)
> [ 7.611276] Waiting up to 3 more seconds for network.
> [ 7.881278] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
> [ 8.131277] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
> [ 8.401169] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
> [ 8.671269] Waiting up to 2 more seconds for network.
> [ 8.941274] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
> [ 9.211181] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
> [ 9.481274] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
> [ 9.751275] Waiting up to 1 more seconds for network.
> [ 10.021281] Waiting up to 0 more seconds for network.
> [ 10.291274] Waiting up to 0 more seconds for network.
> [ 10.381282] Sending DHCP requests .
> [ 10.473000] fec 2188000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
> [ 12.861267] ., OK
> [ 12.903405] IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 192.168.66.1, my address is 192.168.66.58
>
> So at least I got a link, but the link is still late to got

The delay is likely something entirely different, it could be some of
Heiner's recent changes to PHYLIB, Heiner do you have access to a system
that polls the PHY?
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-18 22:11    [W:0.112 / U:8.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site