lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 3/5] seccomp: add a way to get a listener fd from ptrace
Tycho, Sorry for the duplicate, I forgot to CC the list :(

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:00 PM Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws> wrote:
>
>
> That's one of the use cases, but there are a large number of others. I
> discuss a few in patch 1:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-containers/msg33956.html
>

Thanks this is making more sense to me now.

I haven't been keeping up with the list and just did a bunch
of reading. It seems that stackable LSM's are making some real
progress now, and I wonder if those patches are merged would
using a stacked security module approach be worth exploring if
it provides the same or greater flexibility, and assuming all
syscalls of interest can be hooked somehow?

>FWIW, I'm dropping the ptrace bits (and the fd passing bits)
>from the next version, because they seem fairly controversial.

Yeah ptrace can be difficult to work with, no doubt it is
controversial; <3 Yama. I've used the ptrace method for counting
syscall failures, and ignoring the non-trivial amount of time it
took me to learn the API then write working code, the performance
loss (in a syscall heavyweight program like web browser) is a
noticeable problem, outside of a debugging or analysis context.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-18 00:42    [W:0.107 / U:1.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site