[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:32:16 -0700 John Hubbard <> wrote:

> > I'm not really understanding. Patch 3/3 changes just one infiniband
> > driver to use put_user_page(). But the changelogs here imply (to me)
> > that every user of get_user_pages() needs to be converted to
> > s/put_page/put_user_page/.
> >
> > Methinks a bit more explanation is needed in these changelogs?
> >
> OK, yes, it does sound like the explanation is falling short. I'll work on something
> clearer. Did the proposed steps in the changelogs, such as:
> [2]
> Proposed steps for fixing get_user_pages() + DMA problems.
> help at all, or is it just too many references, and I should write the words
> directly in the changelog?
> Anyway, patch 3/3 is a just a working example (which we do want to submit, though), and
> many more conversions will follow. But they don't have to be done all upfront--they
> can be done in follow up patchsets.
> The put_user_page*() routines are, at this point, not going to significantly change
> behavior.
> I'm working on an RFC that will show what the long-term fix to get_user_pages and
> put_user_pages will look like. But meanwhile it's good to get started on converting
> all of the call sites.

I see. Yes, please do put all of it into the changelog[s].

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-11 01:44    [W:0.067 / U:2.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site