lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
> > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
> > * Public or private harassment
> > * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> > - address, without explicit permission
> > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission
> > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
> > professional setting
> >
>
> I agree we want something like this, the question is whether we want
> to change the CoC text from upstream, or clarify it in a separate
> section.

If this comes from some kind of "upstream", that should be clearly
marked so in the document or at least in the git log. I was always
wondering who created that "useful document".

Pavel
(And would still like to know what the background story is.)

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-10 18:37    [W:0.355 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site