lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM64: dts: meson-axg: uart: Add the pinctrl info description
Hi Yixun,

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com> wrote:
> Describe the pinctrl info for the UART controller which is found
> in the Meson-AXG SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@amlogic.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> index 644d0f9eaf8c..1eb45781c850 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> @@ -448,6 +448,70 @@
> function = "spi1";
> };
> };
> +
> + uart_a_pins: uart_a {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_tx_a",
> + "uart_rx_a";
> + function = "uart_a";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_a_cts_rts_pins: uart_a_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_cts_a",
> + "uart_rts_a";
> + function = "uart_a";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_b_x_pins: uart_b_x {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_tx_b_x",
> + "uart_rx_b_x";
> + function = "uart_b";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_b_x_cts_rts_pins: uart_b_x_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_cts_b_x",
> + "uart_rts_b_x";
> + function = "uart_b";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_b_z_pins: uart_b_z {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_tx_b_z",
> + "uart_rx_b_z";
> + function = "uart_b";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_b_z_cts_rts_pins: uart_b_z_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_cts_b_z",
> + "uart_rts_b_z";
> + function = "uart_b";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_ao_b_z_pins: uart_ao_b_z {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_tx_b_z",
> + "uart_ao_rx_b_z";
> + function = "uart_ao_b_gpioz";
(the following question just came up while I was looking at this
patch, but I guess it's more a question towards the pinctrl driver)
the name of the function looks a bit "weird" since below you are also
using "uart_ao_b"
did you choose "uart_ao_b_gpioz" here because we cannot have the same
function name for the periphs and AO pinctrl or is there some other
reason?

I am asking because I would have expected it to look like this:
groups = "uart_ao_tx_b_z", "uart_ao_rx_b_z";
function = "uart_ao_b";

(same for the cts/rts pins below)

> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_ao_b_z_cts_rts_pins: uart_ao_b_z_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_cts_b_z",
> + "uart_ao_rts_b_z";
> + function = "uart_ao_b_gpioz";
> + };
> + };
> };
> };
>
> @@ -492,12 +556,45 @@
> gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl_aobus 0 0 15>;
> };
>
> +
did you add this additional newline on purpose?
> remote_input_ao_pins: remote_input_ao {
> mux {
> groups = "remote_input_ao";
> function = "remote_input_ao";
> };
> };
> +
> + uart_ao_a_pins: uart_ao_a {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_tx_a",
> + "uart_ao_rx_a";
> + function = "uart_ao_a";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_ao_a_cts_rts_pins: uart_ao_a_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_cts_a",
> + "uart_ao_rts_a";
> + function = "uart_ao_a";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_ao_b_pins: uart_ao_b {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_tx_b",
> + "uart_ao_rx_b";
> + function = "uart_ao_b";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart_ao_b_cts_rts_pins: uart_ao_b_cts_rts {
> + mux {
> + groups = "uart_ao_cts_b",
> + "uart_ao_rts_b";
> + function = "uart_ao_b";
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> pwm_AO_ab: pwm@7000 {
> --
> 2.15.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-amlogic mailing list
> linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

Regards
Martin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:16    [W:0.140 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site