[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/18] x86, barrier: stop speculation for failed access_ok
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Willy Tarreau <> wrote:
>> To be fair there's overreaction on both sides. The vast majority of
>> users need to get a 100% safe system and will never notice any
>> difference.
> There is no such thing as a "100% safe system". Never will be - unless
> you make sure you have no users.
> Also, people definitely *are* noticing the performance issues with the
> current set of patches, and they are causing real problems. Go search
> for reports of Amazon AWS slowdowns.
> So this whole "security is so important that performance doesn't
> matter" mindset is pure and utter garbage.
> And the whole "normal people won't even notice" is pure garbage too.
> Don't spread that bullshit when you see actual normal people
> complaining.
> Performance matters. A *LOT*.

I'm thinking we should provide the option to at least build the
hot-path nospec_array_ptr() usages without an lfence.


...if only for easing performance testing and let the distribution set
its policy.

Where hot-path usages can do:

nospec_relax(nospec_array_ptr()) optionally ellide the lfence.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:16    [W:0.189 / U:2.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site