Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:49:32 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel |
| |
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:21:44AM -0800, David Lang wrote: > The point is that in many cases, if someone explits the "trusted" process, > they already have everything that the machine is able to do anyway.
...and then we don't need the per-process complication anyway.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
|  |