Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Lu, Hongjiu" <> | Subject | RE: [RFC PATCH 13/12] Retpoline vs. CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_SYMBOLS | Date | Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:57:08 +0000 |
| |
Please checkout patches for GCC 7:
https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commits/hjl/indirect/gcc-7-branch/master
For GCC trunk:
https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commits/hjl/indirect/master
H.J.
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org] > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2018 9:33 AM > To: Lu, Hongjiu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>; Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>; > Van De Ven, Arjan <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>; Tsimbalist, Igor V > <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com> > Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linux-foundation.org>; Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>; > Hansen, Dave <dave.hansen@intel.com>; tglx@linutronix.de; Kees Cook > <keescook@google.com>; Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>; Peter Zijlstra > <peterz@infradead.org>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>; Jiri > Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>; gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/12] Retpoline vs. > CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_SYMBOLS > > On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 15:09 +0000, Lu, Hongjiu wrote: > > Sure, I can use __x86_indirect_thunk_rax. > > Great, thanks. > > I've made that change on top of your 20171219 patch set which is the > latest I've seen, and pushed it to my tree at > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/gcc- > retpoline.git/shortlog/refs/heads/retpoline-20180107 > > I assume you'll want to redo those patches so that it's > __x86_indirect_thunk_rax from the start, rather than starting with dots > and then changing it, but I'll let you deal with that and push it > upstream. Building compiler now, and then I'll update and simplify the > kernel patches accordingly.
|  |