[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 13/12] Retpoline vs. CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_SYMBOLS
On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 15:09 +0000, Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
> Sure, I can use __x86_indirect_thunk_rax.

Great, thanks.

I've made that change on top of your 20171219 patch set which is the
latest I've seen, and pushed it to my tree at

I assume you'll want to redo those patches so that it's
__x86_indirect_thunk_rax from the start, rather than starting with dots
and then changing it, but I'll let you deal with that and push it
upstream. Building compiler now, and then I'll update and simplify the
kernel patches accordingly.
[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:16    [W:0.056 / U:2.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site