[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On 01/28/2018 03:40 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:43:30 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:24:01 +0000
>> Jeremy Cline <> wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2017 12:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:52:34 +0000
>>>> Jeremy Cline <> wrote:
>>>>> Some BOSC0200 acpi_device-s describe two accelerometers in a single ACPI
>>>>> device. Check for a companion device and handle a second i2c_client
>>>>> if it is present.
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <>
>>>> The requirement for this is still horrible, but you have done a nice
>>>> clean job on implementing it.
>>>> I'll let this sit for a few more days though before applying it.
>>>> Probably next weekend if we don't get any feedback before then.
>>> Hey,
>>> I didn't see this land anywhere (I was looking in
>>>, maybe that's not
>>> the right place?) and I just wanted to make sure this didn't get lost in
>>> the holiday shuffle.
>> It did indeed get lost - thanks for the reminder. Now applied to the
>> togreg branch of iio.git. However, unfortunately we may be too near
>> to the merge window opening for it to make it. Depends on what Linus
>> says later today when rc8 comes out.
> I've added some #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI defenses against the case
> of no ACPI support being compiled in. Alternative would be to add
> stubs for those functions that don't have them...
> probably just acpi_device_hid.
> But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a patch
> removing the ifdef fun if you like!

Great, thanks for handling that. I'll look at taking care of the stubs
and whatnot.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-30 16:22    [W:0.117 / U:9.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site