[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 16:15:01 -0800
Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> > It should be a CPU_BUG bit as we have for the other mess. And that can be
> > used for patching.
> It has to be done at compile time because it requires a compiler option.
> Most of the indirect calls are in C code.
> So it cannot just patched in, only partially out.

You can replace the pushl ; jmp with an alternatives section (although
there might be a lot of them). Even if gcc isn't smart enough to do that
perl is.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 01:31    [W:0.130 / U:2.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site