[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner <> wrote:
> It should be a CPU_BUG bit as we have for the other mess. And that can be
> used for patching.

That would definitely be the right approach.

However, that's also probably quite challenging for the gcc option.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 01:20    [W:0.116 / U:4.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site