lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.14 69/71] bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd
Date
4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

[ upstream commit f37a8cb84cce18762e8f86a70bd6a49a66ab964c ]

Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context
via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we
also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX.

The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or
BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than
that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add
test cases as well for BPF selftests.

Fixes: d691f9e8d440 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -986,6 +986,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_
return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]);
}

+static bool is_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
+{
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[regno];
+
+ return reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX;
+}
+
static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
int off, int size, bool strict)
{
@@ -1258,6 +1265,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifie
return -EACCES;
}

+ if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
+ verbose("BPF_XADD stores into R%d context is not allowed\n",
+ insn->dst_reg);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
/* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */
err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1);
@@ -3859,6 +3872,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
if (err)
return err;

+ if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
+ verbose("BPF_ST stores into R%d context is not allowed\n",
+ insn->dst_reg);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -2596,6 +2596,29 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
+ "context stores via ST",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "BPF_ST stores into R1 context is not allowed",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ },
+ {
+ "context stores via XADD",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W, BPF_REG_1,
+ BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ },
+ {
"direct packet access: test1",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
@@ -4317,7 +4340,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map1 = { 2 },
.errstr_unpriv = "R2 leaks addr into mem",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed",
},
{
"leak pointer into ctx 2",
@@ -4331,7 +4355,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.errstr_unpriv = "R10 leaks addr into mem",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed",
},
{
"leak pointer into ctx 3",

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-29 21:43    [W:0.307 / U:2.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site