[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem
On 01/29/18 10:26, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> That will utterly suck on non-UMIP machines that have
>>> hypervisor-provided UMIP emulation.
>> Is that a valid thing to optimize for, especially given that paranoid
>> entries aren't the most common anyway?
> A bunch of people seem to care about NMI performance for perf.

That wasn't really the question...

> And the current patch set works without this trick.

But I believe the tricks it uses are fragile.

> FWIW, if we switch all entries to the entry text trampoline, we get direct percpu access for free.

That might be a better option.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-29 19:34    [W:0.082 / U:1.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site