lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: Check for a second ACPI device for BOSC0200
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:43:30 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:24:01 +0000
>> Jeremy Cline <jeremy@jcline.org> wrote:
>> > On 12/10/2017 12:21 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 17:52:34 +0000
>> > > Jeremy Cline <jeremy@jcline.org> wrote:

>> > >> Some BOSC0200 acpi_device-s describe two accelerometers in a single ACPI
>> > >> device. Check for a companion device and handle a second i2c_client
>> > >> if it is present.

>> > I didn't see this land anywhere (I was looking in
>> > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git, maybe that's not
>> > the right place?) and I just wanted to make sure this didn't get lost in
>> > the holiday shuffle.
>> It did indeed get lost - thanks for the reminder. Now applied to the
>> togreg branch of iio.git. However, unfortunately we may be too near
>> to the merge window opening for it to make it. Depends on what Linus
>> says later today when rc8 comes out.
>
> I've added some #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI defenses against the case
> of no ACPI support being compiled in. Alternative would be to add
> stubs for those functions that don't have them...
>
> probably just acpi_device_hid.
>
> But that would take much longer. Feel free to propose it and a patch
> removing the ifdef fun if you like!

Where can I see the patch?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-29 15:07    [W:0.095 / U:4.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site