Messages in this thread |  | | From | PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <> | Date | Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:12:47 +0530 | Subject | Re: [RFC] NAND: Optimize NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST read |
| |
Hi Boris,
On 30 October 2017 at 14:04, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hi PrasannaKumar, > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:13:51 +0530 > PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> >> >> Avoid sending unnecessary READ commands to the chip. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> >> Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@gmail.com> >> --- >> This patch is taken from git://projects.qi-hardware.com/qi-kernel.git >> branch jz-3.16. From [1] and [2] it can be seen that the patch author >> thinks this can be sent upstream but it never happened so far. This >> patch is used in OpenWRT as seen from [3]. > > Sounds reasonable, but it's likely to conflict with something I'd like > to queue for 4.16 [1]. I'll rebase this patch on nand/next once the > ->exec_op() series is merged. Don't hesitate to ping me if I forget. > > Regards, > > Boris > > [1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=8923 > >> >> I have only compile tested the patch. >> >> 1. https://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@lists.en.qi-hardware.com/msg04635.html >> 2. https://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@lists.en.qi-hardware.com/msg04639.html >> 3. https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/xburst/patches-3.18/002-NAND-Optimize-NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST-read.patch;h=046da51912de3cd4444779df5de13d2c1999719a;hb=c03d4317a6bc891cb4a5e89cbdd77f37c23aff86 >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> index 12edaae..4bf3bdb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c >> @@ -1680,9 +1680,15 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct mtd_info *mtd, >> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0; >> >> /* Read the OOB area first */ >> - chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READOOB, 0, page); >> - chip->read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); >> - chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, 0, page); >> + if (mtd->writesize > 512) { >> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, mtd->writesize, page); >> + chip->read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); >> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, 0, -1); >> + } else { >> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READOOB, 0, page); >> + chip->read_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); >> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, 0, page); >> + } >> >> ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0, >> chip->ecc.total); >> @@ -1902,8 +1908,10 @@ static int nand_do_read_ops(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, >> __func__, buf); >> >> read_retry: >> - if (nand_standard_page_accessors(&chip->ecc)) >> + if (nand_standard_page_accessors(&chip->ecc) && >> + chip->ecc.mode != NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST) { >> chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, 0x00, page); >> + } >> >> /* >> * Now read the page into the buffer. Absent an error, >
Can you please revisit this?
Thanks, PrasannaKumar
|  |