lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 06/44] clk: davinci: Add platform information for TI DM365 PLL
From
Date
On Monday 08 January 2018 07:47 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This adds platform-specific declarations for the PLL clocks on TI
> DaVinci 365 based systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/clk/davinci.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile b/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
> index 6720bd0..353aa02 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,5 @@ obj-y += pll.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830) += pll-da830.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850) += pll-da850.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM355) += pll-dm355.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365) += pll-dm365.o
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9892b0b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * PLL clock descriptions for TI DM365
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "pll.h"
> +
> +static const char * const dm365_pll_obsclk_parent_names[] = {
> + "ref_clk",
> +};
> +
> +static u32 dm365_pll_obsclk_table[] = {
> + 0x10,

Perhaps use a #define here. Something like OBSCLK_SEL_OSC.

> +void __init dm365_pll_clk_init(void __iomem *pll1, void __iomem *pll2)
> +{
> + const struct davinci_pll_divclk_info *info;
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register("pll1", "ref_clk", pll1);
> + davinci_pll_aux_clk_register("pll1_aux_clk", "ref_clk", pll1);
> + davinci_pll_bpdiv_clk_register("pll1_sysclkbp", "ref_clk", pll1);
> + davinci_pll_obs_clk_register("clkout0", dm365_pll_obsclk_parent_names,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(dm365_pll_obsclk_parent_names),
> + pll1, dm365_pll_obsclk_table);
> + for (info = dm365_pll1_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> + davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll1);
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register("pll2", "ref_clk", pll2);
> + davinci_pll_aux_clk_register("clkout1", "ref_clk", pll2);
> + davinci_pll_obs_clk_register("clkout1", dm365_pll_obsclk_parent_names,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(dm365_pll_obsclk_parent_names),
> + pll2, dm365_pll_obsclk_table);
> + for (info = dm365_pll2_divclk_info; info->name; info++)
> + davinci_pll_divclk_register(info, pll2);
> +}

With that and the empty line comment I gave earlier.

Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>

Thanks,
Sekhar

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-16 09:50    [W:0.516 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site