lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:perf/core] perf tools: Create function to perform multiple time range checking
Commit-ID:  9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55
Author: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 21:13:44 +0800
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:41:06 -0300

perf tools: Create function to perform multiple time range checking

Previous patch supports the multiple time range.

For example, select the first and second 10% time slices.
perf report --time 10%/1,10%/2

We need a function to check if a timestamp is in the ranges of
[0, 10%) and [10%, 20%].

Note that it includes the last element in [10%, 20%] but it doesn't
include the last element in [0, 10%). It's to avoid the overlap.

This patch implments a new function perf_time__ranges_skip_sample
for this checking.

Change log:

v4: Let perf_time__ranges_skip_sample be compatible with
perf_time__skip_sample when only one time range.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512738826-2628-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/time-utils.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 61c46022..3f7f18f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp)
return false;
}

+bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
+ int num, u64 timestamp)
+{
+ struct perf_time_interval *ptime;
+ int i;
+
+ if ((timestamp == 0) || (num == 0))
+ return false;
+
+ if (num == 1)
+ return perf_time__skip_sample(&ptime_buf[0], timestamp);
+
+ /*
+ * start/end of multiple time ranges must be valid.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ ptime = &ptime_buf[i];
+
+ if (timestamp >= ptime->start &&
+ ((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) ||
+ (timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return (i == num) ? true : false;
+}
+
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
{
u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
index 2308723..34d5eba 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int perf_time__percent_parse_str(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, int num,

bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp);

+bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
+ int num, u64 timestamp);
+
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz);

int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz);
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:22    [W:0.217 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site