lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: lock mutex when freeing IRQs
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 09:06:01AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> > Sent: 26 September 2017 19:57
> > mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free locks the registers mutex, but not
> > mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free, which results in a stack trace from
> > assert_reg_lock when unloading the mv88e6xxx module. Fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: 3460a5770ce9 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Mask g1 interrupts and free interrupt")
> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > index c6678aa9b4ef..e7ff7483d2fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> > @@ -3947,7 +3947,9 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> > if (chip->irq > 0) {
> > if (chip->info->g2_irqs > 0)
> > mv88e6xxx_g2_irq_free(chip);
> > + mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
> > mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free(chip);
> > + mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
>
> Isn't the irq_free code likely to have to sleep waiting for any
> ISR to complete??

Hi David

Possibly. But this is a mutex, not a spinlock. So sleeping is O.K.
Or am i missing something?

Andrew

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-27 15:07    [W:0.121 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site