[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: A patch slipped through the cracks?
Em Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:17:17 +0200
Lubomir Rintel <> escreveu:

> Hi,
> we're trying to get this reasonably trivial patch [1] applied for more
> than a year and four attempts now. (I'm not including it in this
> message so that this message won't be ignored for the same reason the
> submissions were, whatever they are.)
> [1]
> I have no idea what went wrong. There was a suspicion (somewhat
> confirmed by the initial patch submitter) that spam filtering could
> have dropped the first message. Since then the patch did make it to the
> list numerous times and was picked up by patchwork.
> The patchwork's idea about the patch being "Superseded" is wrong -- I
> have no idea why. But someone *please* look into this and apply the
> patch.

Not sure what happened, but I tagged is as new. I'll take a look
on it later, when I start handling patches for Kernel 4.15.



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-20 20:07    [W:0.063 / U:3.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site