Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Brown, Aaron F" <> | Subject | RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/5] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:27:46 +0000 |
| |
On 7/21/2017 21:36, Benjamin Poirier wrote: > Lennart reported the following race condition: > > \ e1000_watchdog_task > \ e1000e_has_link > \ hw->mac.ops.check_for_link() === e1000e_check_for_copper_link > /* link is up */ > mac->get_link_status = false; > > /* interrupt */ > \ e1000_msix_other > hw->mac.get_link_status = true; > > link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status > /* link_active is false, wrongly */ > > This problem arises because the single flag get_link_status is used to > signal two different states: link status needs checking and link status is > down. > > Avoid the problem by using the return value of .check_for_link to signal > the link status to e1000e_has_link(). > > Reported-by: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c | 11 ++++++++--- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
|  |