Messages in this thread |  | | From | Chen-Yu Tsai <> | Date | Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:00:59 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Drop few entries from whitelist |
| |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > On 16-08-17, 16:53, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: >> > Drop few ARM (32 and 64 bit) platforms from the whitelist which always >> > use "operating-points-v2" property from their DT. They should continue >> > to work after this patch. >> > >> > Tested on Hikey platform (only the "hisilicon,hi6220" entry). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> >> > --- >> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 11 ----------- >> > 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c >> > index 061b468512a2..45f2ec3b7f7a 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c >> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c >> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id whitelist[] __initconst = { >> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31s", }, >> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20", }, >> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23", }, >> > - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33", }, >> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", }, >> > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3", }, >> > >> >> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >> >> In fact, we can drop all the sun8i entries. Of them, only sun8i-a33 has >> cpufreq implemented. All the other ones are missing thermal sensor support, >> and no OPP tables have been added yet. > > Then, why did you guys add all those SoCs there ? :)
The idea was to add all the SoCs to the cpufreq driver first, and sort out the thermal sensor and device tree parts later. Obviously this progressed very slowly.
ChenYu
|  |