Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:12:24 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature |
| |
* Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW., I don't think the #ifdef is necessary: lockdep_init_map_crosslock should map > > to nothing when lockdep is disabled, right? > > IIUC, lockdep_init_map_crosslock is only defined when > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y,
Then lockdep_init_map_crosslock() should be defined in the !LOCKDEP case as well.
> [...] moreover, completion::map, which used as > the parameter of lockdep_init_map_crosslock(), is only defined when > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE=y.
If the !LOCKDEP wrapper is a CPP macro then it can ignore that parameter just fine, and it won't be built.
Thanks,
Ingo
|  |