Messages in this thread |  | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:03:55 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure |
| |
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: >> I'm perfectly fine with the I3C / I2C framework separation. The only >> minor problem I had with that was the inaccuracy of the >> sysfs/device-model representation: we don't have one i2c and one i3c >> bus, we just have one i3c bus with a mix of i2c and i3c devices. > > I understand that. What if I2C had the same seperation between the "bus" > and the "master"?
There can be multiple masters on an i2c bus. But not on an i3c bus, due to SCL being push/pull.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
|  |