[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Wolfram Sang <> wrote:
>> I'm perfectly fine with the I3C / I2C framework separation. The only
>> minor problem I had with that was the inaccuracy of the
>> sysfs/device-model representation: we don't have one i2c and one i3c
>> bus, we just have one i3c bus with a mix of i2c and i3c devices.
> I understand that. What if I2C had the same seperation between the "bus"
> and the "master"?

There can be multiple masters on an i2c bus. But not on an i3c bus, due
to SCL being push/pull.



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-16 23:05    [W:0.107 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site