Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:13:27 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to req->response_type |
| |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:10:01AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 06:22:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:38:34PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > > > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > > > > > > > req->response_type is being assigned the sizeof TB_CFG_PKG_RESET > > > > and should actually be assigned TB_CFG_PKG_RESET. Fix this. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > > > > > IIRC I already acked this some time ago ;-) > > > > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > BTW, you should CC Greg as he has been gathering Thunderbolt related > > > patches. I added him now. > > > > Yeah. I sent this patch on Jun 14. "[PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix reset > > response_type" I didn't CC Greg, either. Someone should probably > > update MAINTAINERS if Greg needs to get these emails. > > Indeed. > > Greg, Andreas, > > Should we add Greg to the MAINTAINERS so that he will be getting all the > thunderbolt related patches? Another way, if we want to make this easier > for Greg, is to establish a thunderbolt tree in kernel.org and send pull > requests to him directly.
The "maintainers" of thunderbolt should either be forwarding on patches to me to accept, or to give me a git tree to pull, or to ack patches that I am cc:ed on. Whichever works best for them, but in all cases, I am not the maintainer of the thunderbolt subsystem, so I don't need to be listed under MAINTAINERS.
thanks,
greg k-h
|  |