[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 1/6] bsg: fix kernel panic resulting from missing allocation of a reply-buffer
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> When the BSG interface is used with bsg-lib, and the user sends a
> Bidirectional command - so when he gives an input- and output-buffer
> (most users of our interface will likely do that, if they wanna get the
> transport-level response data) - bsg will allocate two requests from the
> queue. The first request's bio is used to map the input and the second
> request's bio for the output (see bsg_map_hdr() in the if-statement with
> (op == REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT && hdr->din_xfer_len)).
> When we now allocate the full space of bsg_job, sense, dd_data for each
> request, these will be wasted on the (linked) second request. They will
> go unused all the time, as only the first request's bsg_job, sense and
> dd_data is used by the LLDs and BSG itself.
> Right now, because we don't allocate this on each request, those spaces
> are only allocated for the first request in bsg-lib.
> Maybe we can ignore this, if it gets to complicated, I don't wanne
> prolong this unnecessary.

We have the same 'issue' with bidirection scsi commands - it's a side
effect of having two request structures for these commands, and the
only real fix would be to have a single request structure, which would
be nice especially if we can't do it without growing struct request.

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-13 16:41    [W:0.111 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site