lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v1 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE
Hi,

On 06/07/17 20:56, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Juri,
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:

[...]

> > if (attr->sched_flags &
> > - ~(SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK | SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM))
> > + ~(SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK |
> > + SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM |
> > + SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> I was thinking if its better to name SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL something more
> descriptive than "special", since it will not be clear looking at
> other parts of the code that this is used for the frequency scaling
> thread or that its a DL task. I was thinking since this flag is
> specifically setup for the sugov thread frequency scaling purpose, a
> better flag name than SPECIAL might be SCHED_FLAG_DL_FREQ_SCALE or
> SCHED_FLAG_FREQ_SCALE. But I am Ok with whatever makes sense to do
> here. Thanks,
>

Sure.

How about SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV then?

Thanks,

- Juri

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-07 12:44    [W:0.098 / U:3.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site