lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/8] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data when it
> returns execution to the non-secure world again.
> An asynchronous receive path is not implemented.
> This allows the usage of a mailbox to trigger firmware actions on SoCs
> which either don't have a separate management processor or on which such
> a core is not available. A user of this mailbox could be the SCP
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 8 ++
> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index c5731e5..5664b7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -170,4 +170,12 @@ config BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX
> Mailbox implementation of the Broadcom FlexRM ring manager,
> which provides access to various offload engines on Broadcom
> SoCs. Say Y here if you want to use the Broadcom FlexRM.
> +
> +config ARM_SMC_MBOX
> + tristate "Generic ARM smc mailbox"
> + depends on OF && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> + help
> + Generic mailbox driver which uses ARM smc calls to call into
> + firmware for triggering mailboxes.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index d54e412..8ec6869 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -35,3 +35,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC) += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX) += tegra-hsp.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMC_MBOX) += arm-smc-mailbox.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..578aed2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2016,2017 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This device provides a mechanism for emulating a mailbox by using
> + * smc calls, allowing a "mailbox" consumer to sit in firmware running
> + * on the same core.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +
Please have relook at what headers are really needed.

> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_SMC (0 << 0)
> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC (1 << 0)
> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_METHOD_MASK (1 << 0)
> +
Maybe have only
#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC BIT(0)

> +struct arm_smc_chan_data {
> + u32 function_id;
> + u32 flags;
> +};
> +
> +static int arm_smc_send_data(struct mbox_chan *link, void *data)
> +{
> + struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data = link->con_priv;
> + u32 function_id = chan_data->function_id;
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> + u32 msg = *(u32 *)data;
> +
> + if ((chan_data->flags & ARM_SMC_MBOX_METHOD_MASK) == ARM_SMC_MBOX_SMC)
> + arm_smccc_smc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + else
> + arm_smccc_hvc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
if (chan_data->flags & ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC)
arm_smccc_hvc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
else
arm_smccc_smc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);

is simpler.

> + mbox_chan_received_data(link, (void *)res.a0);
> +
Or you can update the 'data' with value from 'a0' ?

> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int arm_smc_startup(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smc_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> +}
> +
startup and shutdown can be omitted now.

> +/* This mailbox is synchronous, so we are always done. */
> +static bool arm_smc_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops = {
> + .send_data = arm_smc_send_data,
> + .startup = arm_smc_startup,
> + .shutdown = arm_smc_shutdown,
> + .last_tx_done = arm_smc_last_tx_done
> +};
> +
> +static int arm_smc_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> + struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data;
> + const char *method;
> + bool use_hvc = false;
> + int ret = 0, i;
> +
No need to initialise 'ret'

> + ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "arm,smc-func-ids",
> + sizeof(u32));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "method", &method)) {
> + if (!strcmp("hvc", method)) {
> + use_hvc = true;
> + } else if (!strcmp("smc", method)) {
> + use_hvc = false;
> + } else {
> + dev_warn(dev, "invalid \"method\" property: %s\n",
> + method);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mbox)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mbox->num_chans = ret;
> + mbox->chans = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*mbox->chans),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!mbox->chans)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + chan_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*chan_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chan_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
> + u32 function_id;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node,
> + "arm,smc-func-ids", i,
> + &function_id);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + chan_data[i].function_id = function_id;
> + if (use_hvc)
> + chan_data[i].flags |= ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC;
> + mbox->chans[i].con_priv = &chan_data[i];
> + }
> +
> + mbox->txdone_poll = true;
> + mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> + mbox->txpoll_period = 1;
> + mbox->ops = &arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops;
> + mbox->dev = dev;
> +
> + ret = mbox_controller_register(mbox);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mbox);
> + dev_info(dev, "ARM SMC mailbox enabled with %d chan%s.\n",
> + mbox->num_chans, mbox->num_chans == 1 ? "" : "s");
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int arm_smc_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct mbox_controller *mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + mbox_controller_unregister(mbox);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id arm_smc_mbox_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "arm,smc-mbox", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smc_mbox_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver arm_smc_mbox_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "arm-smc-mbox",
> + .of_match_table = arm_smc_mbox_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = arm_smc_mbox_probe,
> + .remove = arm_smc_mbox_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(arm_smc_mbox_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM smc mailbox driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.9.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-02 19:27    [W:0.148 / U:2.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site