Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:14:34 +0530 | From | Abhishek Sahu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/14] qcom: mtd: nand: allocate bam transaction |
| |
On 2017-07-03 13:52, Sricharan R wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > <..> > >> +/* Allocates and Initializes the BAM transaction */ >> +static struct bam_transaction * >> +alloc_bam_transaction(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, unsigned >> int >> num_cw) >> +{ >> + struct bam_transaction *bam_txn; >> + >> + bam_txn = devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn), GFP_KERNEL); >> + >> + if (!bam_txn) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + bam_txn->bam_ce = >> + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->bam_ce) * >> + num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_ELEMENTS, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!bam_txn->bam_ce) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + bam_txn->cmd_sgl = >> + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->cmd_sgl) * num_cw * >> + QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_CMD_SGL, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!bam_txn->cmd_sgl) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + bam_txn->data_sg = >> + devm_kzalloc(nandc->dev, sizeof(*bam_txn->data_sg) * >> + num_cw * QPIC_PER_CW_MAX_DATA_SGL, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!bam_txn->data_sg) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + nandc->max_cwperpage = num_cw; >> + >> + return bam_txn; >> +} >> + >> static inline struct qcom_nand_host *to_qcom_nand_host(struct >> nand_chip >> *chip) >> { >> return container_of(chip, struct qcom_nand_host, chip); >> @@ -1868,6 +1958,8 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_setup(struct >> qcom_nand_host *host) >> mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_nand_ooblayout_ops); >> >> cwperpage = mtd->writesize / ecc->size; >> + nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage, >> + cwperpage); >> >> /* >> * DATA_UD_BYTES varies based on whether the read/write command >> protects >> @@ -2010,6 +2102,19 @@ static int qcom_nandc_alloc(struct >> qcom_nand_controller *nandc) >> dev_err(nandc->dev, "failed to request cmd channel\n"); >> return -ENODEV; >> } >> + >> + /* >> + * Initially allocate BAM transaction to read ONFI param page. >> + * After detecting all the devices, this BAM transaction will >> + * be freed and the next BAM tranasction will be allocated with >> + * maximum codeword size >> + */ >> + nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc, 1); >> + if (!nandc->bam_txn) { >> + dev_err(nandc->dev, >> + "failed to allocate bam transaction\n"); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> } >> >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nandc->desc_list); >> @@ -2153,6 +2258,17 @@ static int qcom_probe_nand_devices(struct >> qcom_nand_controller *nandc) >> if (list_empty(&nandc->host_list)) >> return -ENODEV; >> >> + if (nandc->dma_bam_enabled) { >> + free_bam_transaction(nandc); >> + nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc, >> + nandc->max_cwperpage); > > Somehow, looks like something is missing because, nandc->max_cwperpage > passed from > here is used in alloc_bam_transaction, but it is assigned in the same > function ? >
Yes. This assignment is not required. I will fix this in v2.
> Regards, > Sricharan
-- Abhishek Sahu
|  |