lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: nf_conntrack: Infoleak via CTA_ID and CTA_EXPECT_ID
From
Date
Florian,

Am 01.07.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Florian Westphal:
>>> Perhaps we can place that in a new extension (its not needed in any
>>> fastpath ops)?
>>
>> To get rid of the infoleak we have to re-introduce the id field in struct nf_conn
>> and struct nf_conntrack_expect.
>
> Why will this not work?

You are right, when we compute the ID from the whole object, it should be fine.

>> Otherwise have nothing to compare against in the conntrack/expect remove case.
>
> Not following, sorry. The id is not used anywhere except when we send
> info to userspace.
>
> The compare on removal is not needed afaics, and its also not used when
> doing lookup to begin with, so we can just recompute it?

Isn't this a way too much overhead?

I personally favor Pablo's per-cpu counter approach.
That way the IDs are unique again and we get rid of the info leak without
much effort.

Thanks,
//richard

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-07-12 23:27    [W:0.086 / U:2.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site