lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:31:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/common_tests
> tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/run_numerictests
> tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/run_stringtests
>
> between commit:
>
> d644437a1dc6 ("tools/testing/selftests/sysctl: Add pre-check to the value of writes_strict")
>
> from the kselftest tree and commit:
>
> fed7038685f3 ("test_sysctl: add generic script to expand on tests")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the files and so, for now I have effectively
> dropped the kselftest tree patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>

urgh.

I'll drop

test_sysctl-add-dedicated-proc-sysctl-test-driver.patch
test_sysctl-add-generic-script-to-expand-on-tests.patch
test_sysctl-test-against-page_size-for-int.patch
test_sysctl-add-simple-proc_dointvec-case.patch
test_sysctl-add-simple-proc_douintvec-case.patch
test_sysctl-test-against-int-proc_dointvec-array-support.patch

Luis, could you please redo these against the changes in linux-next and
resend?

Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-29 21:36    [W:0.074 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site