[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process, profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi
On 29.05.2017 14:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:56:05PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> On 29.05.2017 13:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> Why can't the tree do both?
>> Well, indeed, the tree provides such capability too. However switching to
>> the full tree iteration in cases where we now go through _groups lists will
>> enlarge the patch, what is probably is not a big deal. Do you think it is
>> worth implementing the switch?
> Do it as a series of patches, where patch 1 introduces the tree, patches
> 2 through n convert the list users into tree users, and patch n+1
> removes the list.

Well ok, let's do that additionally but please expect delay in delivery
(I am OOO till Jun 14).

> I think its good to not have duplicate data structures if we can avoid
> it.

yeah, makes sense.

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-29 13:45    [W:0.134 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site