lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [git pull] uaccess-related bits of vfs.git
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, even in arch/* they tend to nest. E.g. arch/alpha has 133 callers
> total. Distribution by files:
> 35 arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
> 92 arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c
> 1 arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c
> 4 arch/alpha/lib/csum_partial_copy.c
> 1 arch/alpha/mm/fault.c

Another large pile is on sparc (208 callers). Except that on sparc64
access_ok() is constant 1, which reduces it to 42 callers.
3 arch/sparc/kernel/ptrace_32.c (all in arch_ptrace())
31 arch/sparc/kernel/signal_32.c (5 in do_sigreturn(),
6 in do_rt_sigreturn(),
8 in setup_frame(),
11 in setup_rt_frame(),
1 in do_sys_sigstack())
7 arch/sparc/kernel/sigutil_32.c (2 in save_fpu_state(),
2 in restore_fpu_state(),
2 in save_rwin_state(),
1 in restore_rwin_state()
1 arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c (in compute_si_addr())

The last one ignores -EFAULT, BTW - not sure what should it have done
in that case, though. It's calculation of ->si_addr on SIGSEGV and SIGBUS
in case of data access SIGSEGV or SIGBUS; it wants to peek into insn to
figure out the effective address. arch_ptrace() one is zeroing several
fields in userland struct fps for PTRACE_GETFPREGS. Could've been
put_user() (or clear_user(), for that matter); we'd just done
copy_regset_to_user() on adjacent addresses, so the lack of access_ok() is not
a security hole there). Everything else is in sigframe handling...

Other large piles are on mips, ppc and itanic. parisc is next, but there
access_ok() is constant 1 as well. Same for s390 and m68k. nios2 and
unicore32 are a bit under 80 callers each and the next are tile (~60),
sh (~50) and then it drops off fast.

It's not impossible to review; the problem is in figuring out which codepaths
are hot enough to worry about them. And I'm even more convinced that
bulk search-and-replace is the right approach here; we probably _can_ get
rid of that shit this cycle (or, at least, reduce its use to very few places
in arch/*), but that'll require some cooperation from architecture maintainers.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-13 21:12    [W:0.080 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site