[lkml]   [2017]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: new flag: AT_NO_JUMPS
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Al Viro <> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:38:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> It sounds more like AT_NO_ESCAPE ... or AT_BELOW, or something.
> I considered AT_ROACH_MOTEL at one point... Another interesting
> question is whether EXDEV would've been better than ELOOP.
> Opinions?

In support of my homeland, I propose AT_HOTEL_CALIFORNIA.

How about EXDEV for crossing a mountpoint and ELOOP for absolute
symlinks or invalid ..? (Is there a technical reason why the same AT_
flag should trigger both cases?)


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-05-01 06:53    [W:0.201 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site