lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the selinux tree
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:27:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the selinux tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/avc.c:35:0:
>> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/include/classmap.h:242:2: error: #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
>> #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
>> ^
>> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'socket_type_to_security_class':
>> /home/sfr/next/next/security/selinux/hooks.c:1409:2: error: #error New address family defined, please update this function.
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> da69a5306ab9 ("selinux: support distinctions among all network address families")
>>
>> interacting with commit
>>
>> ac7138746e14 ("smc: establish new socket family")
>>
>> from the net-next tree.
>>
>> I added the following merge fix patch:
>>
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:22:21 +1100
>> Subject: [PATCH] selinux: merge fix for "smc: establish new socket family"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> ---
>> security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 +++-
>> security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> index bada3cd42b9c..712fd0e7c91d 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> @@ -1405,7 +1405,9 @@ static inline u16 socket_type_to_security_class(int family, int type, int protoc
>> return SECCLASS_KCM_SOCKET;
>> case PF_QIPCRTR:
>> return SECCLASS_QIPCRTR_SOCKET;
>> -#if PF_MAX > 43
>> + case PF_SMC:
>> + return SECCLASS_SMC_SOCKET;
>> +#if PF_MAX > 44
>> #error New address family defined, please update this function.
>> #endif
>> }
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> index 0dfd26d0b8d8..40f1d4f8bc2a 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> +++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> @@ -235,9 +235,11 @@ struct security_class_mapping secclass_map[] = {
>> { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
>> { "qipcrtr_socket",
>> { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
>> + { "smc_socket",
>> + { COMMON_SOCK_PERMS, NULL } },
>> { NULL }
>> };
>>
>> -#if PF_MAX > 43
>> +#if PF_MAX > 44
>> #error New address family defined, please update secclass_map.
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>
> This now applies when I merge the security tree (as it merged the
> selinux tree, presumably).

Yes, James just pulled the SELinux tree yesterday.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-02-10 13:42    [W:0.102 / U:1.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site