Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: schedutil: Use idle_calls counter of the remote CPU | Date | Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:45:13 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 8:32:09 PM CET Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:47:12AM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote: > >> Since the recent remote cpufreq callback work, its possible that a cpufreq > >> update is triggered from a remote CPU. For single policies however, the current > >> code uses the local CPU when trying to determine if the remote sg_cpu entered > >> idle or is busy. This is incorrect. To remedy this, compare with the nohz tick > >> idle_calls counter of the remote CPU. > >> > >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > Sweet!
OK, so any chance to get a Fixes: tag for the patch?
Thanks, Rafael
|  |