[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function implementations
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:23 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<> wrote:
>>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions
>> This one is questionable since it prints error messages at ->init() stage.
>> I would rather not touch this.
> Do you find the Linux allocation failure report insufficient in this case?

It is up to the current driver maintainer. For me it sounds better to
have than not to.

>>> Improve a size determination in tpacpi_new_rfkill()
>> Doesn't make any sense right now. One style over the other.
>> Nothing gets better or worth at this point.
> Would you like to care for a bit more compliance with information
> from the section “14) Allocating memory” in the document “coding-style.rst”?

You know, in Russian we have an adverb: Заставь дурака б-гу молиться,
он и лоб расшибёт.
Which has English equivalent: Give a man enough rope and he’ll hang himself.

With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-19 18:29    [W:0.161 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site