lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 1/2] bdisp: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in bdisp_hw_reset
From
Date

On 2017/12/19 18:43, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 16/12/17 12:54, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
>> The function call path is:
>> bdisp_device_run (acquire the spinlock)
>> bdisp_hw_reset
>> msleep --> may sleep
>>
>> To fix it, readl_poll_timeout_atomic is used to replace msleep.
>>
>> This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and
>> checked by my code review.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> index b7892f3..e94a371 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
> This delay.h include is no more needed, remove it.
>
>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>
>> #include "bdisp.h"
>> #include "bdisp-filter.h"
>> @@ -366,7 +367,7 @@ struct bdisp_filter_addr {
>> */
>> int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
>> {
>> - unsigned int i;
>> + u32 tmp;
>>
>> dev_dbg(bdisp->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>
>> @@ -379,15 +380,14 @@ int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
>> writel(0, bdisp->regs + BLT_CTL);
>>
>> /* Wait for reset done */
>> - for (i = 0; i < POLL_RST_MAX; i++) {
>> - if (readl(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1) & BLT_STA1_IDLE)
>> - break;
>> - msleep(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
>> - }
>> - if (i == POLL_RST_MAX)
> As recommended by Mauro, please add this comment:
> Despite the large timeout, most of the time the reset happens without
> needing any delays
>
>> + if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1, tmp,
>> + (tmp & BLT_STA1_IDLE), POLL_RST_DELAY_MS,
>> + POLL_RST_DELAY_MS * POLL_RST_MAX)) {
> read_poll_timeout expects US timings, not MS.
>
>> dev_err(bdisp->dev, "Reset timeout\n");
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + }
>>
>> - return (i == POLL_RST_MAX) ? -EAGAIN : 0;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /**

Hi,

Okay, I have submitted a new patch according to your advice :)


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-19 14:57    [W:0.869 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site