[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: nouveau. swiotlb: coherent allocation failed for device 0000:01:00.0 size=2097152
Am 19.12.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 2017-12-19 11:37 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2017-12-18 08:01 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>>> On 12/18/17 7:06 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Kernel bound workloads seem to trigger the below for whatever reason.
>>>>   I only see this when beating up NFS.  There was a kworker wakeup
>>>> latency issue, but with a bandaid applied to fix that up, I can still
>>>> trigger this.
>>> Hi,
>>> i have seen this one as well with my system, but i could not find an
>>> easy way to trigger it for bisecting purpose. If you can trigger it
>>> conveniently, a bisect would be nice!
>> I'm seeing this (with the amdgpu and radeon drivers) when restic takes a
>> backup, creating memory pressure. I happen to have just finished
>> bisecting, the result is:
>> 648bc3574716400acc06f99915815f80d9563783 is the first bad commit
>> commit 648bc3574716400acc06f99915815f80d9563783
>> Author: Christian König <>
>> Date: Thu Jul 6 09:59:43 2017 +0200
>> drm/ttm: add transparent huge page support for DMA allocations v2
>> Try to allocate huge pages when it makes sense.
>> v2: fix comment and use ifdef
> BTW, I haven't noticed any bad effects other than the dmesg splats, so
> maybe it's just noise about transient failures for which there is a
> proper fallback in place.

Yeah, I think that is exactly what happens here.

We try to allocate a huge page, but fail and so fall back to using
multiple 4k pages instead.

Going to send out a patch to suppress the warning.

Thanks for bisecting this,

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-19 14:46    [W:0.063 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site