lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Add support of frequency domain
+ Gautham,

@Gautham: Can you please help reviewing this one ?

On 13-12-17, 13:49, Abhishek Goel wrote:
> @@ -693,6 +746,8 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> struct powernv_smp_call_data freq_data;
> unsigned int cur_msec, gpstate_idx;
> + cpumask_t temp;
> + u32 cpu;
> struct global_pstate_info *gpstates = policy->driver_data;
>
> if (unlikely(rebooting) && new_index != get_nominal_index())
> @@ -761,24 +816,48 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> spin_unlock(&gpstates->gpstate_lock);
>
> /*
> - * Use smp_call_function to send IPI and execute the
> - * mtspr on target CPU. We could do that without IPI
> - * if current CPU is within policy->cpus (core)
> + * Use smp_call_function to send IPI and execute the mtspr on CPU.
> + * This needs to be done on every core of the policy

Why on each CPU ?

> */
> - smp_call_function_any(policy->cpus, set_pstate, &freq_data, 1);
> + cpumask_copy(&temp, policy->cpus);
> +
> + while (!cpumask_empty(&temp)) {
> + cpu = cpumask_first(&temp);
> + smp_call_function_any(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu),
> + set_pstate, &freq_data, 1);
> + cpumask_andnot(&temp, &temp, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-14 05:43    [W:0.056 / U:1.920 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site