[lkml]   [2017]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Pavel Machek <> wrote:
> Confirmed, revert fixes it. You see how it moves fix_processor_context
> around #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 block? And how people forget 32-bit
> machines exist? Aha.

Yeah, people do.


> Which brings me to .. various people do automated testing of
> kernel. Testing 32-bit kernel for boot, and both 32-bit and 64-bit for
> boot and suspend would be very nice. The last item is not hard, either:
> sudo rtcwake -l -m mem -s 5
> ...should take 10 seconds or so.

I'm told 0day does *some* suspend/resume testing, but I think it's
pretty limited, partly because the kinds of machines it primarily
works on don't really support suspend/resume at all. I'm also not sure
just how many of those machines are 32-bit at all..

But I'm adding Zhang Rui to the cc, to see if my recollection is right.

Because you're right, more suspend/resume automated testing would be
good to have. And yes, people test mainly 64-bit these days.

Also, I'm not even sure what the 0day rules are for just plain
mainline. I don't tend to see a lot of breakage reports, even though
I'd expect to. This came in from the x86 trees (and those do their own
tests too, but probably not suspend/resume either), but it hit my tree
fairly soon after going into the x86 -tip trees.


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-12-10 21:31    [W:0.166 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site