lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: Allow indicating loss of state across suspend/resume
Date
Hello Linus,

It's me again, so I have been thinking about the problem originally
reported in: [PATCH fixes v3] pinctrl: Really force states during suspend/resume

and other similar patches a while ago, and this new version allows a platform
using pinctrl-single to specify whether its pins are going to lose their state
during a system deep sleep.

Note that this is still checked at the pinctrl_select_state() because consumers
of the pinctrl API might be calling this from their suspend/resume functions
and should not have to know whether the provider does lose its pin states.

This is against your pinctrl/for-next branch.

Thanks!

Changes in v2:

- make the property generic and not specific to pinctrl-single

Florian Fainelli (2):
pinctrl: Allow a device to indicate when to force a state
pinctrl: Allow indicating loss of pin states during low-power

.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt | 4 ++++
drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
drivers/pinctrl/core.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.9.3

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-03 00:18    [W:0.127 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site