[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices
Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>> A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having
>> this
>> still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
>> Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users.
>> As suggests, we replace
>> the
>> postal address with "<>" in the samples
>> directory.
> What would be best is to just put the SPDX single line at the top of
> the
> files, and then remove this license "boilerplate" entirely. I've
> started to do that with some subsystems already (drivers/usb/ and
> drivers/tty/ are almost finished, see Linus's tree for details), and
> I've sent out a patch series for drivers/s390/ yesterday if you want to
> see an example of how to do it.
> Could you do that here instead of this patch as well?

Is there consensus about this? I'm not a layer, but is this clear enough
useres? And what holds against only adding the new SPDX tag line at the

Other than I don't like mixing // and /**/ comments, it indeed looks
quite clean. Is there consensus about the syntax too?



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-15 08:47    [W:1.046 / U:2.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site