[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vc4: Ensure interrupts are disabled
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Eric Anholt <> wrote:
> Stefan Schake <> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Eric Anholt <> wrote:
>>> Stefan Schake <> writes:
>>>> The overflow mem work callback vc4_overflow_mem_work reenables its
>>>> associated interrupt upon completion. To ensure all interrupts are disabled
>>>> when we return from vc4_irq_uninstall, we need to disable it again if
>>>> cancel_work_sync indicated pending work.
>>> Is there a reason we need the interrupts disabled at the V3D level while
>>> we have the IRQ disabled at the irqchip level? Once we re-enable at the
>>> irqchip, we immediately V3D_WRITE(V3D_INTENA, V3D_DRIVER_IRQS) anyway.
>> irqchip will mask it in the ARM interrupt controller, so we will certainly never
>> see an interrupt. I'm not sure on the exact guarantees V3D_INTENA and
>> V3D_INTCTL make - does the state in INTENA affect if V3D will signal an
>> interrupt in INTCTL? We're not currently clearing the latter in postinstall.
> INTENA/INTDIS writes update the state of the single register that
> controls which bits of INTCTL get ORed together to raise the interrupt
> outside the V3D block.

Then I certainly agree - this patch doesn't do anything and should be
dropped. Good call!


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-15 00:19    [W:0.080 / U:5.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site