[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink()
Hi Markus,

this discussion went far beyond the original posted patch for vxcan.c

I would suggest you post your idea of the simplified error handling flow
in vxcan.c just on linux-can ML (which is the right mailing list for CAN
related stuff).


On 10/28/2017 10:13 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Are you interested in related adjustments for a bigger code base?
>> No. Definitely not.
> You might have noticed that I am proposing similar changes already
> for other software modules. ;-)
>> If you aim for the the deletion of “ < 0” for all rtnl_configure_link() users
>> you would need to do this consistently.
> How do you see the software situation around a function
> like “register_netdevice”?
> Regards,
> Markus

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-29 11:52    [W:0.036 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site