[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Can we break RDPID/RDTSCP ABI ASAP and see if it's okay?
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> We currently do this on boot:
> write_rdtscp_aux((node << 12) | cpu);
> This *sucks*. It means that, to very quickly obtain the CPU number
> using RDPID, an ALU op is needed. It also doesn't bloody work on
> systems with more than 4096 CPUs.
> IMO it should be ((u64)node << 32) | cpu. Then getting the CPU number is just:

That breaks 32bit

> RDPID %rax
> MOVL %eax, %eax
> I'm thinking about this because rseq users could avoid ever *loading*
> the rseq cacheline if they used RDPID to get the CPU number, and it
> would be nice to give them a sane way to do it.
> This won't break any existing RDPID users if we do it quickly because
> there aren't any (the CPUs aren't available). I would be a bit
> surprised if anyone uses RDTSCP for this because it's absurdly slow.

What we can do on 64bit is:

((u64) cpu << 32) | (node << 12) | (cpu & 0xfff)

That does not solve the ALU op problem but works on both 32 and 64 bit and
on systems with more than 4096 CPUs.



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-10-29 10:08    [W:0.093 / U:7.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site